Artologium
← Back to your results

Costume and Accessories

Shawl Border Fragment

India. 1815/20. Wool, double interlocking 2:2 'S' twill tapestry weave; ends of pieced 2:2 'S' twill weaves; main warp fringe. Explore the catalogue record, image rights and documented connections from The Art Institute of Chicago.

Shawl Border FragmentIndia · 1815/20The Art Institute of Chicago · CC0
Image & source
Tapestry with paisley design throughout in reds, purples, blues, and beiges, with fringe on top and bottom.

Costume and Accessories / Source record

Shawl Border Fragment

Read the catalogue and evidence →
Maker
India
Date
1815/20
Medium
Wool, double interlocking 2:2 'S' twill tapestry weave; ends of pieced 2:2 'S' twill weaves; main warp fringe
Collection
The Art Institute of Chicago
Accession
1894.1096
Credit
Gift of Mrs. John J. Glessner through the Antiquarian Society
Rights
Public domain · CC0

Public domain · CC0. Unchanged copy of the institution’s verified web image; smaller responsive JPEGs are resized derivatives. Full-resolution image remains linked to the institution. Editorial views may show a detail.

Institution’s full-resolution image ↗Museum reuse policy ↗

Institutional rights designation checked 2026-10-17. Catalogue descriptions are normalized from source data; visual interpretation may be unassessed.

Original museum record ↗Read the CC0 dedication ↗

A record, with reasons

Ways into this work

Open a description to see its meaning and evidence, or follow it into the collection.

Catalogue knowledge

Normalized from the museum’s record.

Costume and AccessoriesObject type

Costume and Accessories is a type of object named in the museum catalogue.

An explicitly supplied catalogue description, normalized conservatively. It does not independently establish attribution, completeness, symbolism or historical influence.

The Art Institute of Chicago supplies “Costume and Accessories” in its object type field. This label was normalized by the documented import rule.

Costume and Accessories

Catalogue: The Art Institute of Chicago. Automated source-field normalization; no independent visual interpretation.
Source normalization checked 2026-10-21 · 2026-10-20.1

WoolMaterial

Wool is a material named in the museum catalogue.

An explicitly supplied catalogue description, normalized conservatively. It does not independently establish attribution, completeness, symbolism or historical influence.

The Art Institute of Chicago supplies “Wool, double interlocking 2:2 'S' twill tapestry weave; ends of pieced 2:2 'S' twill weaves; main warp fringe; wool (textile)” in its medium/materials field. This label was normalized by the documented import rule.

Wool, double interlocking 2:2 'S' twill tapestry weave; ends of pieced 2:2 'S' twill weaves; main warp fringe; wool (textile)

Catalogue: The Art Institute of Chicago. Automated source-field normalization; no independent visual interpretation.
Source normalization checked 2026-10-21 · 2026-10-20.1

WeavingTechnique

Weaving is a making process named in the museum catalogue.

An explicitly supplied catalogue description, normalized conservatively. It does not independently establish attribution, completeness, symbolism or historical influence.

The Art Institute of Chicago supplies “Wool, double interlocking 2:2 'S' twill tapestry weave; ends of pieced 2:2 'S' twill weaves; main warp fringe; twill weaving; fringed” in its medium/techniques field. This label was normalized by the documented import rule.

Wool, double interlocking 2:2 'S' twill tapestry weave; ends of pieced 2:2 'S' twill weaves; main warp fringe; twill weaving; fringed

Catalogue: The Art Institute of Chicago. Automated source-field normalization; no independent visual interpretation.
Source normalization checked 2026-10-21 · 2026-10-20.1

Visual observation

Observations of the displayed image.

Not yet assessed.

Artologium reading

Authored connections, open to interpretation.

Not yet assessed.

These descriptions belong to this object and its selected image. Unlisted features may be unassessed. Editorial observations and readings were developed with AI assistance; they do not establish the maker’s intent.